6 Tech Trends Changing the Face of Healthcare [INFOGRAPHIC]

Technological innovations in healthcare are changing the face of the industry. Patient record digitization and EHR-integrated medical transcription services have paved the way for quicker and smarter clinical documentation. Telemedicine proved to be a game changer for many practices during the lockdown. The face of medical transcription is also witnessing technological advances that are altering the way patient records are produced.

Check out the infographic below

Healthcare

How Medical Transcription has Evolved Through the Years

Medical Transcription

The occupation of medical transcriptionists as defined by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), is to “transcribe medical reports recorded by physicians and other healthcare practitioners using various electronic devices, covering office visits, emergency room visits, diagnostic imaging studies, operations, chart reviews, and final summaries. Transcribe dictated reports and translate abbreviations into fully understandable form. Edit as necessary and return reports in either printed or electronic form for review and signature, or correction”. Medical transcription services have come a long way since their inception. The earliest records were surgery notes on papyrus in 1600 BC, according to Mobius MD. The 21st century sees medical transcriptionists playing a key role in the healthcare system by supporting physicians in the creation of electronic health records (EHRs).

Prior to the 1960s, physicians made their own notes on patient encounters, tests and operations. With the establishment of hospitals and other medical facilities in the early 20th century, a more formal method of creating patient records became necessary. The first medical note-takers were stenographers or medical secretaries who took physician dictation in shorthand and type out the notes on typewriters. The paper documents, which included handwritten notes and typed reports, were stored in individualized folders in filing cabinets. When a particular patient’s record was required, it would have to be located and delivered to the requesting physician.

The next phase in the history of medical transcription began when audio devices such as the portable recorder and tape cassette entered the scene. This laid the foundation for medical transcription as a formal profession. With audio devices, medical transcriptionists could record physician dictation and transcribe it at a later time.

The introduction of word processing machines in the 1970s improved transcription accuracy and speed. Advancements in technology transformed medical transcription as well. Dictation technology progressed from micro-cassettes to digital recorders to voice recognition. In 1978, the American Association for Medical Transcription (AAMT), now known as the Association for Healthcare Documentation Integrity (AHDI), was established as part of an effort to achieve recognition for and support the medical transcription profession. In 1999, the U.S. Department of Labor awarded medical transcriptionists their own job classification.

In the meanwhile, things changed dramatically with the advent of the internet. Physician dictation could now be sent via the web to medical transcription companies in other locations, either in the country or abroad, for transcription. The files were uploaded to and downloaded from an FTP server by medical transcriptionist and the healthcare provider.

In 2015, the introduction of electronic health records (EHRs) transformed the way clinical documentation is created. To ease documentation, EHRs come with cookie-cutter templates, drop-down lists, and check boxes that the physician can to document interactions and care at the patient encounter. With front-end speech recognition, providers need to edit/proofread their results to ensure the templated information is entered correctly and dictated text is accurately recognized by the technology. In other words, rather than easing things for the physician, the EHR made documentation more complex and physicians found it difficult to manage data entry with the patient sitting in front of them.

With physician stress and patient safety concerns associated with EHR usability issues, medical transcription outsourcing saw an uptick in dictation volumes as physicians turned to these clinical documentation specialists for support for editing and proofreading transcribed documents. Moreover, medical transcription software can safely and directly create an interface with the EHR. This allows the software to interpret data more effectively and eliminate any static information. With EHR implementation, the medical transcription process is required to comply with HL7 data requirements, which has increased the demand for advanced dictation software with speech recognition capabilities for more efficient data transfer.

Experience shows that speech recognition assisted clinical documentation comes with a higher rate of errors than records created with the help of medical transcriptionists. The technology’s ability to transcribe unfamiliar words and homophones such as their/there, terms, drug names, and phrases is limited. Also, the software tends to find it difficult to interpret different accents or dialects and dictation that lacks clarity. This means that the report generated will usually have errors and need substantial editing. With their busy schedules, physicians hardly have time to review their dictations. Fortunately, they can rely on an experienced medical transcription company to handle this task efficiently and in fast turnaround time.

To conclude in the words of Gary David, PhD in a For the Record Q&A: “Transforming dictated voice files into complete healthcare documentation is an amazing skill that involves a range of competencies. Ultimately, doctors do not generate revenue; documents generate revenue. When reimbursement occurs, it is based on the documents. When audits occur, they are based on the documents. Coding is done on the documents. Without quality documents, this process can break down”.

5 Strategies to Partner with Patients and Improve Quality of Care

Partner with Patients

Physicians are focused on providing the best quality care supported by advanced technologies and innovative treatments. Medical transcription outsourcing allows clinicians to manage their EHR documentation tasks as they concentrate on their core activities. However, for their efforts to succeed, physicians need to partner with patients and encourage them to actively engage in their own healthcare. Today, patients have access to information, medical knowledge and their own health records. Building a successful doctor-patient partnership is crucial for achieving the best possible care outcomes.

Partnering with patients is about ‘patient activation’ which is different from ‘patient engagement’. “Patient activation emphasizes patients’ willingness and ability to take independent actions to manage their health and care,” according to Judith Hibbard, one of the first experts to define patient activation (www.patientengagementhit.com). This definition goes beyond ‘compliance’ which means getting patients to follow advice.

Patient activation means implementing strategies to encourage patients to become partners in their own care. Patients need to understand their role in the care process and get access to reliable healthcare information and digital health technology so that they have the knowledge and skills to make informed care decisions. Let’s take a look at some expert tips on building patient partnership:

  • Providing Patients with Information about their Health: Patients should be made aware about their health conditions, treatments, and other health issues. They can be given educational material such as patient summaries, discharge instructions or written materials on new medications. In a 2018 study, researchers sent hypertension patients with low activation levels customized educational material about their conditions and potential treatment options. The material, in the form of a letter, identified the patient’s BP goal and provided suggestions to help them achieve it. The letter encouraged patients to initiate discussions with their healthcare provider about treatment options. The study, which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), found that such clinician-led patient education can drive activation levels.
  • Providing Health Information in Engaging and Accessible Formats: Patients should be provided with health information and explanations about care in simple language. All material need to be reviewed and simplified to ensure that the patient understands it. Information can be provided in formats such as print, mobile, apps and online channels. A Becker’s Hospital Review article recommends: “keeping materials simple enough for a sixth grader to comprehend and follow, healthcare professionals position themselves and their patients for success rather than failure”.
  • Understanding and Documenting Individual Needs, Preferences and Goals: Partnering with patients to improve their care also means providing clear and useful information to patients, helping patients set goals, and develop strategies to maintain a healthier lifestyle. It is important to keep in mind that people expect their own needs, lifestyle preferences and desires to be considered in the care planning process. In person-centered care, the individual’s goals and preferences are taken into account when building the plan of care. The provider should document goals and interventions in discussion with the individual or their family. Patient engagement in setting goals has been found to impact their participation in and adherence to treatment as well as improve their health outcomes and quality of life. Patients should also be educated to support self-management.
  • Encouraging Patient Question Asking: Patients should feel comfortable to ask questions about their health and related concerns. They need to know that asking questions is acceptable, and that their questions will be heard. Providers need to be ready to provide satisfactory answers on topics important to the patient. Encouraging patient question asking will make patients feel they are actively involved in any decisions that are being made about their care.
  • Developing Programs to Encourage Adherence to Treatment: Adherence to treatment protocols, including medications and wellness plans is crucial for interventions to be effective. Making patients partners in their care calls for addressing barriers. Healthcare professionals need to first identify the barriers that prevent adherence and then leverage patient-centered strategies to overcome those barriers. Good adherence improves the effectiveness of interventions, leads to fewer hospitalizations and readmissions, and reduces the costs of care.

Building effective partnerships with patients and their caregivers/families takes time and commitment. Adopting advanced digital technologies and tools such as decision aids, appointment and medication reminders, automated appointment and follow-up scheduling calls can improve patient engagement. Patients can now view their medical records online. Viewing the notes can remind patients about what was discussed with their physicians during a visit and promote involvement and adherence. Providers can rely on medical transcription services to ensure complete, up-to-date and accurate medical records which can make all the difference to the quality and continuity of care.

Expert Recommendations for Documenting an Older Patient’s Medical History

Medical History

The medical record is a medical and legal document that contains information about a patient’s health and medical history. The History and Physical (H&P) is fundamental part of a medical transcription service provider’s work and the first report added to the patient’s medical record when physicians see the patient for the first time. The H&P is crux of the medical treatment plan and the most important tool in the exam of the patient in the emergency department. When it comes to an older patient, a proper medical history and physical exam is critical for correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

The components of the H&P are: chief comp, present illness, past history, review of systems, physical exam, problem list and differential diagnosis. For older adults, physiology of aging and pathologic conditions related to aging can make diagnosis difficult. The National Institute of Aging (NIA) recommends that in addition to medical and family history details, the history for geriatric patients should include information about their social circumstances and lifestyle.

General Recommendations

According to the NIA and other valid sources, there are several factors that physicians should take into account when documenting older patients’ medical history:

  • It may take more time (even several sessions) as the patient may take more time to explain things or because of sensory impairment and cognitive decline.
  • It would be a good idea to obtain preliminary information before the consultation using printed (use large font) forms sent by email.
  • Choose the question format – open-ended or simple yes-no questions – based on the patient’s ability to respond.
  • Before evaluating the current illness, get the medical history immediately after the chief complaint. This will make it easier to understand the patient condition.
  • Though information is best obtained first-hand from the patient, caregivers or other sources should be contacted to if doubts arise.
  • The provider should refer to the mental health status report if the patient’s responses are clearly inadequate or inappropriate.
  • Make sure that patients only have to tell their story once. Also, find out if anything has changed since their last visit – whether living arrangements have changed or they have experienced any personal loss.
  • The physician should sit facing the patient at eye level and speak slowly and clearly, with good lip movement. Questions should be presented in print if the patient has hearing issues.
  • Pay attention when patients express their concerns – this in itself can be therapeutic and build trust.

Areas Needing Special Attention

  • Current Issues: Older patients may have multiple health issues. The focus should be on what’s currently troubling them the most. Certain medical conditions can increase risk for severe illness. Older adults diagnosed with COVID-19 are at greater risk of severe illness and hospitalization or death.
  • Functional Assessment: Functional impairments and cognitive and affective problems are common among older patients. The physician should ask questions to identify impairments in Basic Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Recognizing these impairments would enable appropriate management or referral.
  • Medications: Polypharmacy and misuse of medications can lead to many health complications in older adults. It’s important to ask patients about all their prescription and over-the-counter medications and dosages as well as any alternative treatments and dietary supplements they may be using. A widely recommended strategy is to ask patients to bring along their medications in a paper bag.
  • Family History: The NIA notes that getting information about family history is important not only to understand the patient’s genetic risks but also to get information about the health of family members or relatives taking care of the patient and the kind of support that they can provide, if needed.
  • Social and Nutritional History: Assessment of social history will help reveal issues related to lifestyle, affect, cognition, function, values, health beliefs, cultural factors and caregiver support. Getting information about the patient’s home can provide an understanding their illness and might improve adherence to treatment. Nutritional assessment can identify risk of malnutrition and whether referral for dietetic consultation is necessary

All members of the patient’s care team refer to the H&P right from the point of its creation. The H&P remains a central element in the patient record even as additional reports are added on in repeat visits to document progress, interventions, surgery and so on. While the H&P for a patient with not-so-serious concerns may be brief, the reports for older patients with multiple chronic conditions are likely to be detailed and lengthy. Accurate and timely medical chart documentation by an experienced medical transcription company can go a long way in helping physicians focus on the consultation and interviewing older patients to elicit all the information relevant to their care.

Medical Record Documentation – Take Care to Avoid these Common Errors

Medical Record Documentation

Healthcare providers are well aware that documenting each patient’s condition and history of care is crucial and medical transcription outsourcing plays an important role here. To ensure proper care, the information about the patient must be communicated to other caregiver’s in the team.

An incomplete or inaccurate patient record can compromise care and shows:

  • care was incomplete
  • there were gaps, indicating poor clinical care
  • lack of compliance with policies

Documentation errors (either commission or omission) result in improper medical advice being provided. By affecting care, poor documentation in patient clinical records can lead to allegations of negligence. It can also result in expensive, painful, and/or unnecessary diagnostic studies, billing mistakes, cause loss of reimbursement, and lead to charges of fraud and malpractice.

The first step to ensuring accurate and complete clinical documentation is recognizing the common errors that can occur and taking steps to prevent them.

  • Confusing Statements from a Physician Related to Misinterpreted Dictation or Transcription Errors: It is critical that a reliable medical transcription service provider handles the task of converting physician dictation into text. Patient’s medications, procedures, and activities and ongoing developments in treatment need to be accurately documented for the reference of other caregivers. Certified and trained medical transcriptionists are familiar with even difficult medical terminologies and conditions, which among other things, is necessary for dictation to be transcribed accurately and promptly.
  • Not Documenting Prior Treatment Events: Leaving out even small details of the treatment given to the patient across nursing shifts can have disastrous consequences. All incidents that occurred and treatment provided should be documented so that there is no room for doubt about the patient’s condition. The Nurse Service Organization (NS) recommends that nurses leverage hospital standard flow sheets in the patient’s EHR to document details of the treatment given to the patient.
  • Not Placing an Operative Note on the Chart Immediately after an Operation is Performed: The operative note should be dictated and signed within 24 hours of operation/procedure. This document records the operation that the patient had, what was found during the surgery, and the surgeon’s post-operative instructions. Having this information in the chart is crucial for continuity of care when patient is moved into the recovery room or discharged.
  • Medication Errors and Omissions: Medication errors can occur during prescribing, transcribing, dispensing and during administration. It is critical to record every medication given to the patient over the entire course of treatment-including the dose, route, and time of each administration. A 2017 study from the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority noted the EHR users are highly prone to making medication errors that negatively impact patient safety. Up to one third of mistakes were due to dose omissions, wrong dosage or over dosage, and extra dosages, according to the study. Many errors were also caused by improper documentation of medication instructions in the EHR errors. Errors were also caused when prescribers entered free-text instructions in the order comments field, which later went unnoticed by a pharmacist or nurse.
  • Recording on the Wrong Patient Chart: Another EMR documentation mistake is entering orders in the wrong patient’s chart. Though uncommon, this mistake usually occurs when patients share the same name. It poses a major patient safety hazard. For instance, if a medication order is transcribed onto the wrong patient’s chart it will result in the medication being administered to that patient. NSO recommends assigning a different nurse to each patient when there are two or more patients with the same name. The patient’s wrist band should be checked before giving medications. Organizations should also implement a system of identifying patients’ names and medication records.
  • Misplaced Documentation: According to AHIMA misplaced documentation concerns range from “data entered into the wrong field in an EHR to scrounging for missing pieces in a hybrid health record environment, misplaced information”. Common issues include misplaced progress notes, different providers using different terminology to explain the same condition, etc.
  • Not Completing the Medical Record within the Specified Time: Each patient’s condition and history of care should be recorded in a timely manner. There are specific time requirements for completion of each element in the medical record:
    • History and Physical – completed and signed within 24 hours of admission
    • Post-op note – written immediately after surgery
    • Operative Note – dictated and signed within 24 hours of operation/procedure
    • Medical Record – should be completed within 7 days of discharge or outpatient visit

Strong documentation practices improve team communication and continuity of care. EHR documentation can be significantly improved through the use of medical transcription services. Skilled medical transcriptionists can ensure timely and accurate documentation to convey clinical information about patients’ diagnoses, treatment, and outcomes.

Importance of Proofreading and Reviewing SR-Generated EHR Clinical Documents

EHR

Speech recognition technology (SRT) converts the spoken word to text and helps physicians to improve productivity and turnaround time. SRT is widely used in Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems of healthcare organizations and medical practices. As it eliminates the need to use the keyboard, SRT simplifies and speeds up tasks like searches, queries, and even form-filling. Medical transcription services have evolved to include SRT editing which involves identifying errors in physicians’ SRT-draft documents.

In Front End SRT, the physician dictates directly into the machine and the words are automatically transcribed and displayed on the screen in real-time. Errors can be corrected and the document can be finalized and signed immediately by the physician. The main drawback of this method is that takes up a lot of the physician’s time. In Back End SRT, the speech-to- text conversion takes place after the dictation is complete. The software converts the digital voice files into a text document and this is sent to a medical transcription company for proofreading and editing. The transcriptionist has to listen to the voice file to identify errors in the draft document. With Back End SRT, the physician is freed of this task.

The goal of speech recognition software is to enable accurate, faster and more cost- effective healthcare delivery and documentation than handwritten notes or medical transcriptionists. However, in reality, speech recognition technology has fallen short of its potential, according to an article published in the Journal of AHIMA in 2020. The article cites a 2017 study published in Jama Network Open which found that SRT-generated documents did not provide the promised accuracy. The researchers found that editing, and review by healthcare documentation specialists and healthcare providers was crucial for SR generated clinical notes.

The study was based on 217 randomly selected medical reports of different types that had been dictated by 144 physicians from two different healthcare facilities using SRT. The error rate in the documents was:

  • 7.4% in in SRT generated reports
  • 0.4% after reports were reviewed by medical transcriptionist, and
  • 0.3% in the final version signed by the dictating physicians

SRT made errors in the prescribed doses of medicine, medication names, numbers, and even medical conditions. There were also word deletions, omissions and misinterpretations.

The researchers pointed out that though the error rate is a little lower after clinician review, requiring clinicians to review notes rather than allowing medical transcriptionists to assist with review may further increase administrative burden.

“Clinicians face pressure to decrease documentation time and often only superficially review their notes before signing them,” wrote researchers. “Fully shifting the editing responsibility from transcriptionists to clinicians may lead to increased documentation errors if clinicians are unable to adequately review their notes,” they explained.

Other common SRT transcription errors include spelling, grammar, word substitution, homophones, incorrect tense, punctuation mistakes, incomplete phrases, and age/gender mismatching. Oftentimes, SRT cannot recognize heavy accents and multiple speakers.

Completed and signed medical reports are regarded as legal documents. Therefore, before signing, the document should be carefully proofread by an experienced medical transcription service provider or healthcare documentation specialist, and finally reviewed by the physician. Not having documentation quality assurance practices in place can lead to malpractice suits and heavy penalties. Experts also highlight the importance of investigating clinicians’ satisfaction with SR technology, its ability to fit in with clinicians’ workflows, and its impact on documentation quality and efficiency compared with other documentation methods (beckershospitalreview.com).

Organizations that utilize SRT should implement proper policies and procedures to ensure that SRT-generated clinical documents are proofread and reviewed. An ideal option would be to have a reliable medical transcription company check the accuracy, completeness and format of EHR documents transcribed by the software before they are reviewed and signed by the clinician.

Patients Access to Radiology Reports – Perspectives and Recent Developments

Radiology Reports

Timely and accurate imaging reports are critical to help physicians determine the optimal course of care. Radiology transcription services play a key role in help radiologists prepare their reports. Today, hospitals offer patients access to radiology reports through secure online portals. Under a new information-blocking provision included in the 21st Century Cures Act, radiology practices are required to ensure a more timely release of imaging reports to patients.

Benefits of Reporting to Patients

Conventionally, radiologists reported results to the referring physician, and it was the referring physician who informed patients about their radiology results. With the recognition of individuals’ right to their medical information, there has been a shift in this practice and patients can now access their electronic health record, including radiology reports. Experience shows that allowing patients direct access to their radiology reports has a positive impact:

  • Reinforces patient-clinician communication
  • Enables radiologists to becomes more involved in their patients’ treatment decisions
  • Improves health literacy and helps patients use information and services to take informed health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others
  • Gives patients the opportunity to understand their reports before they see their doctor
  • Encourages patients to become more involved in their care and self-management of their disease
  • Clear and full radiology reports can be shared by patients with other specialists to obtain further explanations, second opinion, or continuous treatments
  • Boosts teamwork and care coordination

The components of radiology reports transcribed by medical transcription companies include the type of exam, clinical history, comparison with previous exam, technique, findings, and impression, which is the radiologist’s summary of the findings. Much of the early opposition to giving patients access to their imaging reports was due to the concern that patients wouldn’t be able to understand the content of the reports and could easily misinterpret the results for the worst (www.radiologytoday.net).

New Law Mandates more Timely Release of Imaging Reports to Patients

The information-blocking provision of the Cures Act is aimed at promoting data interoperability and allow immediate access and portability of personal health information by patients, providers and payers. The law requires that electronic reports – including radiology reports – be released to patients immediately after finalization.

Prior to the Information Blocking Rule, most radiology departments had followed time-delayed releases (embargo) of radiology reports to patients. One reason for the delayed approach was technologic feasibility barriers. A more typical reason was to give the treating physician who ordered the test to first receive, review and discuss the radiology report with their patient. One study found that embargo periods varied among the surveyed institutions from 1-3 days (34.4%) to 7-14 days (9.4%) and indefinite (20.3%) (www.auntminnie.com). With the new rule, researchers are expecting a major change in practice with regards to patients’ early access to radiology report. Radiology departments are preparing to eliminate the embargos and provide patients with prompt access to their radiology reports.

Need to make Radiology Reports more Patient Friendly

It’s not enough to give patients quick access to their imaging reports – radiologists need to make the reports more patient friendly. In fact, a new study published in Insights into Imaging found that patients were not satisfied with current radiology reports because the reported results were not easy to understand. The study which was based on an online discussion forum analysis found that:

  • There is a big gap between patients’ understanding and current radiology reports
  • Online question and answer platforms are an important option to understand about patient needs
  • Patients’ need to understand their reports should always be taken into consideration
  • Providing appropriate reports that patients understand should be a priority

The researchers concluded that radiologists should focus on designing a consumer-friendly radiology report that focuses on major patient concerns.

As radiologists prepare to provide speedy patient access to their imaging reports, a team from Massachusetts General Hospital radiology department offered several recommendations to streamline the process and improve patient understanding of their imaging reports (www.diagnosticimaging.com):

  • Providing a short summary at the end of reports in lay language to help patients better understand their results.
  • Including a message for the patient about whether findings are normal or abnormal
  • Add any recommended next steps to help ease patient worries
  • Change workflow and operations to shorten the interval between imaging and appointments to about 48 hours.
  • Include the radiologist’s phone number on the imaging report. Conversations with the radiologist can improve a patient’s understanding of imaging results.
  • Provide patients with simple definitions of complex terms as well as pictures or links to information sources

Radiology transcription services play an important role in ensuring accurate, complete, and timely radiology reports to enhance the quality of patient care. As the nation moves towards a more transparent health records, an experienced medical transcription company can help organizations improve data interoperability and facilitate easy patient access to medical records, including radiology reports.

What Are the Key Components in a Hospital Discharge Summary? [INFOGRAPHIC]

A well-structured and accurate discharge summary is important for diverse purposes such as transferring information between the hospital care team and aftercare providers, helping physicians to quickly identify how to respond to the patient’s hospitalization, to promote patient safety, and for legal purposes. Lack of important discharge details can lead to poor treatment plans. Professional medical transcription services help physicians obtain accurate transcripts of discharge summaries and any other medical records.

Check out the infographic below
Hospital Discharge Summary

Importance of Interface between Practice EMR and Pathology LIS

EMR and Pathology LIS

Every day, pathologists and other laboratory professionals work with primary care physicians as well as specialists and utilize laboratory testing to find or rule out diseases and conditions. These laboratory experts help physicians make critical decisions about treatment for cancer, management of diabetes, heart disease, and other chronic conditions. Advanced, high-quality lab medicine is crucial for patients to receive the right diagnosis and appropriate treatment for the identified disease. Timely and accurate pathology transcriptions ensure that interpretations of biopsy results, Pap tests, and other biological samples are documented.

Pathology tests include blood tests, and tests on urine, stools and bodily tissues. Specimen processing relies on turnaround time and efficiencies, making it one of the most critical elements of lab workflow. Fast processing of laboratory test results is essential to quickly and accurately diagnose and treat patients. Over the last decade, labs have steadily moved on from manual to implementing automated testing. Lab tests support overall health improvement and better disease management throughout a person’s lifespan.

The volume of laboratory tests being performed has been increasing at a rate of 6-8% per year, according to a study published in the American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research in 2019. Since the COVID-19 outbreak, clinical laboratories have been in the forefront to provide quality and accurate test results, even as they faced unprecedented challenges and uncertainties. The digital care environment has made things even more complex. Experts say that establishing an interface between practice electronic medical record (EMR) systems and pathology laboratories can improve workflow and efficiency in both settings. This implies the efficient deployment of laboratory Information System-Electronic Medical Record (LIS-EMR) electronic interfaces.

A laboratory information system (LIS) is a software program that receives and stores requests for tests, and results entered by laboratory technicians or directly from laboratory instruments. LIS capabilities include handing patient check-in, order entry, results entry, patient demographics, specimen processing, and routing test results. The electronic medical record (EMR) is a computerized medical record that holds the health records of a hospital, clinic, physician’s office or any organization that delivers care. Modern LIS systems are designed to interface with EMRs of health care organizations. Such interfacing offers many benefits:

  • Precise and Prompt Communication between Medical Practice and Pathology Lab: With the clinician and patient waiting for test results, labs aim to get final reports out as soon as we can. With LIS-EMR interface, practices have the capability to order lab tests and receive the results directly within their system. Timely and accurate communication of test results is central to ensuring the provision of appropriate care.
  • Smooth Workflow without Additional Staff Involvement: Interfacing LIS with the practice EMR allows important information to be shared instantly. Practices can receive lab results into the EMR will allow clinicians to automatically review, search, track and sort results without involving additional support staff.
  • Reduces Risk of Data Errors: By sending requisitions digitally, practices can reduce the probability of errors by avoiding the need for the lab to re-enter the data in the LIS. Data delivered directly into the LIS helps in avoiding errors such as absent or incorrect patient demographic data, technical errors, lack of medical necessity, lack of pre-authorization, erroneous patient demographic information, incorrect provider data, and more, according to www.mlo-online.com.
  • Saves Time and Helps Clean Claim Submission: Interfacing the laboratory ordering system with the practice management or EMR system ensures that labs receive clean up-to-date patient demographic and insurance information directly from the EHR. Demographic data is pulled into the lab requisition at the time of the order, saving the time and effort needed to retype patient data. Clean orders information in the LIS through EHR connectivity will improve the quality of care and also helps labs reduce operational costs, submit clean claims and improve their bottom lines.
  • Improves Patient Satisfaction: Patients are anxious about their results, which is why reliable and timely delivery of lab results is critical. EMR interfaces and optimal laboratory processes can reduce the turnaround time from when a sample is taken to when a result is received, promoting better quality care and patient satisfaction. As LIS-EMR interface improve data integrity, it also contributes to patient safety.

Producing accurate pathology reports depends on having the pathologist’s reports documented by an efficient medical transcription company. Trained and experienced transcriptionists would be familiar with medical terminology and can ensure complete, accurate and interpretable pathology transcriptions. Partnering with a reliable company can help pathologists focus on their core tasks – delivering timely and accurate test results in real-time through LIS-EMR interface to support the physician decision-making process and drive positive patient outcomes.

What Are the Different Types of Electronic Healthcare Record Software?

Electronic Healthcare Record Software

Medical documentation is an important aspect in the healthcare industry, and over the years it has undergone several changes. Earlier, the medical record was a simple handwritten document which has now transformed into digital format. Today, healthcare units and hospitals have adopted EHR systems for efficient management of medical documents. It improves speed and access to the medical data physicians need to make the right healthcare decision for their patients. EHR is an electronic record of an individual’s medical history and this standardized system ensures secure exchange of health information. EHRs are designed to improve healthcare quality, ensure patient safety, and reduce health costs. With the EHR, patient health data can be shared among all the authorized parties involved in the patient’s care: clinicians, labs, pharmacies, emergency facilities, nursing homes, state registries, and patients themselves. However, EHR documentation burden often leads to physician burnout. The conventional dictation- transcription process can be utilized even in this EHR age, wherein professional transcriptionists help in creating structured narrative medical reports of patients. Reliable EHR-integrated medical transcription services ensure quality and accuracy of the medical records. This system helps physicians focus more on providing patient care rather than wasting time in documentation.

EHRs play a crucial role in the healthcare industry. The information included in the EHR include the patient’s medical history along with the diagnoses, treatments, immunization dates, allergies, tests and laboratory reports that allow physicians to decide on the best treatment plan for the patient. There are four types of EHRs.

  • Software: This is a traditional model of EMR, where the healthcare organization has to physically install software on to a computer or a server at the practice location. This is usually used to get the infrastructure started and running and when the infrastructure needs updating, new installations are upgraded. It can accumulate data within the silos of the healthcare practice and are visible to them but cannot provide any insights into the program.
  • Software as a Service (SaaS): With the SaaS model, the practice does not have to exert any technical effort or perform any maintenance; all work is done by the provider and stored in the cloud. The software can be updated on a single network and supports a nationwide provider database for healthcare needs such as orders, referrals, and globally deployed vocabularies and templates. It also serves as a single communications connection to payers, clearing houses, hospitals and pharmacies. The drawback of this model is that it provides only management and maintenance of the software and no services are provided.
  • Cloud-Based Service: In this type of service, the location and hardware are owned by a third party that offers its services by providing software and storage space for your EHR system. Here, the onus of maintenance of the hardware and regular backups is on the vendor. The main advantage of implementing this kind of EHRs is that there is no need for an upfront investment for the hardware requirements and the services can be used on lease with only a monthly fee. However, the disadvantage with these is that they are dependent on internet connectivity.
  • Application Service Provider: With an ASP, the software is installed on the vendor’s system and not on the practice’s own servers. As compared to conventional EHR software technology, this model is more advanced, as it can reduce a practice’s initial expenditures. However, on the other side, the operating costs of this model can rise. The demand for ASPs increased to respond to small- or medium-sized businesses that have tight budgets and cannot afford expensive up-front costs for software. ASPs deliver lower start-up costs for smaller medical practices, but they lack the value of a shared data network or any visibility into a practice’s performance, pertinent benchmarks and growth opportunities. The type of cloud system used in ASP is a closed or private cloud one which allows easy web-based access, but it does not offer open sharing.

EHR is essential in the healthcare setup for ongoing clinical decision making, providing quality patient care, quick reimbursement and risk management. But to ensure accuracy, it also requires the intervention of medical transcription services that can contribute to quick and error-free EHR documentation. Once the dictation is run through the speech recognition software, it has to be edited either by a medical transcriptionist or by the physician for better workflow of the medical practice. After the physician signs the transcript, it can be uploaded into an EHR using HL7 interface for the exchange of health information, medical coding and reimbursement, medical decision support system etc. Accurate medical data helps physicians and healthcare providers to provide better patient care.

  • KEY FEATURES

    • 3 Levels of Quality Assurance
    • Accuracy Level of 99%
    • All Specialties Covered
    • Competitive Pricing
    • Digital Recorder Dictation
    • Electronic Signatures
    • Feeds for EHR or EPM
    • HIPAA Compliant Service
    • Quick Turnaround Time
    • Toll Free Phone Dictation
    • Transcription Management Software
    • Volume Rates Available
  • RECENT BLOGS

  • Categories

  • Quick Contact








    • Infographics