Though we have discussed the several advantages of EHRs in hospitals as well as at medical transcription companies, they have also created new risks and frustrations for doctors and patients. According to a report from the Doctors Company, malpractice claims for errors caused by electronic health records have risen significantly. The study proves that there are always unanticipated consequences when new technologies are rapidly adopted and the EHR is no exception. Currently, 80% physician office practices and 90% hospitals have adopted electronic health records (EHRs) to help optimize productivity, workflow, and communication.
The second study of its kind by the Doctors Company, this new study of 66 EHR-related claims from July 2014 through December 2016 has found that
- 50% of these claims were caused by system factors such as failure of drug or clinical decision support alerts, and
- 58% of claims were caused by user factors such as copying and pasting progress notes
While the company’s first study from 2007 through 2010 has reported just two claims in which EHRs were a factor, from 2011 through December 2016, the number skyrocketed to 161. Comparing both the researches, it was noted –
- 8% increase in system factors (technology and design issues, lack of integration of hospital EHR systems, and failure or lack of alerts and alarms) that contributed to claims
- 6% decrease in user factors (copy-and-paste errors, data entry errors, and alert fatigue)
- Hospital clinics/doctors’ offices remain the top location for EHR-related claim events, while these events are also occurring in patient rooms, ambulatory/day surgery centers, labor and delivery, and emergency rooms
- While internal medicine, hospital medicine, family medicine and nursing and cardiology showed marked decreases among specialties involved in claims, orthopedics, emergency medicine, and obstetrics/gynecology showed increases
The study also highlighted a series of risk mitigation strategies that physicians and clinicians can employ to help avoid malpractice claims, reduce the chance of errors and improve patient safety.
- Make sure to review all data and information is available before treating a patient
- Avoid copy and paste, except when the patient’s past medical history is described
- Never disable or override any alerts in the EHR, instead discuss them with your firm’s IT department. Following alerts would help prevent adverse events.

- Adhere to any alerts within the e-prescribing module of the EHR and document the actions taken
- Let the IT department know about the autopopulation feature that causes erroneous data to be recorded. Record the incorrect details and document the correct ones.
- Record the time of the interaction in the notes written after a patient interaction, thus avoiding any suggestion of inaccurate or false information.
- Assign specific staff in the practice to use the EHR tracking function to ensure that consults and tests are completed, returned, and communicated to the patient.
- Be alert about cyber security and never allow staff to use the physician’s password to review, update, or sign off on lab and imaging results.
As EHR-related malpractice claims are rising, following such risk-mitigation strategies is more important for healthcare settings than ever before. If you are considering outsourcing medical transcription, make sure to choose an EHR-integrated service with relevant experience in the industry.
With limited time and overcrowded waiting rooms, emergency room (ER) physicians find it quite challenging to balance the demands of patient care.
However, the team noted that the physicians preferred the educational materials and suggested that improvements to the video game might make it more effective. Also, a lead researcher says that the physician’s diagnostic skills were not the only reason for the under-triage problem. Factors such as not having an ambulance available to a lack of proper diagnostic tools could prevent a severe trauma patient from being transferred to a trauma center. For instance, when ER physicians order tests and scans for a patient, wait times for other patients rise significantly.
The need for accuracy in electronic health records (EHRs) is more important than ever with healthcare providers increasingly offering patients access to their own EHRs through online portals. Many physicians rely
A recent Medscape article discussed a report from the US Department Health and Human Services’ Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) which found that patient access to medical records is not smooth or easy.
Emergency Rooms (ERs) designed to treat life-threatening illnesses are getting overcrowded now as more Americans are relying on ERs than visiting a doctor. A study published recently in the International Journal of Health Services has found that Emergency departments (EDs) are increasingly a major source of medical care in the United States. Based on the data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Discharge Survey databases, it was found that EDs contributed an average of 47.7% of the medical care delivered in the U.S. and that this percentage increased steadily over the 14-year period. ERs can be hectic, and various kinds of medical reports generated in an emergency room are often documented by
An analysis published by NBC10 Investigators has identified the 3 hospital emergency rooms with the longest wait times are ERs in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware. While the median wait across the country is about 30 minutes, in Pennsylvania, it’s 22 minutes, New Jersey – 25 minutes, and in Delaware – 34 minutes. With such long wait times, possibilities are more for serious medical conditions to go untreated.
In March 2017, 67% of all providers reported using an electronic health record (EHR), a 1% increase over September 2016, according to SK&A, a leading provider of healthcare information solutions and research. However, while EHRs offer many benefits, surveys show that they continue to be a source of frustration as most physicians find EHR data entry a major challenge.
Track progress: The progress of the transition should be monitored. You need to ensure that the new EHR software is working properly and manages your data efficiently. In a Medical Economics report, an expert recommends that physicians determine several metrics prior to the implementation, and then measure against them at key intervals, such as from 30 to 120 days post-implementation, and then again at six months out. He says that physicians should contractually obligate their EHR vendors to deliver such results, with provisions for more training or even refunds if the software doesn’t deliver the required results.
The pilot study investigated the types of clinically relevant information that can be extracted from medical conversations to assist physicians in reducing their interactions with the EHR. The study is fully patient-consented and the content of the recording will be de-identified to protect patient privacy. The company plans to prepare a study on working with physicians and researchers at Stanford University to gather more information on how speech technology can assist in physician note-taking. This study aims at developing a “digital scribe” that helps streamline clinical documentation for physicians. Stanford University’s research in 2017 has found that scribes produced significant improvements in overall physician satisfaction, satisfaction with chart quality and accuracy, and charting efficiency without detracting from patient satisfaction.
Healthcare security breach is widespread and reports indicate that an average of one healthcare organization experiences a data breach every day. 
A
Clinicians are reluctant to code patients as being in remission because of a lack of agreed criteria and guidance. But this may not be the only reason. It may be that few patients are actually trying to achieving remission. The researchers urge health authorities all around the world to come up with clear guidance about how to measure type 2 diabetes remission and make sure that it is officially recorded. Proper coding is also important to monitor progress in achieving remission of type 2 diabetes nationally and internationally. It also improves prediction of long-term health outcomes for patients with a known duration of remission. Proper and accurate coding can raise awareness and encourage more people to try hard to reverse the condition by losing weight rather than living with the disease. Reversing type 2 diabetes by reducing weight helps to create a sense of achievement and empowerment in patients. This method of curing type 2 diabetes removes the stigma of being labelled as a diabetic and also lowers premiums for health insurance, travel insurance and mortgages.
There are many strategies that physicians can adopt to enhance their efficiency and 